You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluating metagenomic assembly approaches for biome-specific gene catalogues
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microbiome, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40168-022-01259-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luis Fernando Delgado, Anders F. Andersson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 2 | 9% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 55% |
| Scientists | 10 | 45% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 15 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 21% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 15% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 11% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 18 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,925,063
of 25,364,603 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#739
of 1,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,974
of 444,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#25
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,364,603 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,754 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.