↓ Skip to main content

Does poor methodological quality of prediction modeling studies translate to poor model performance? An illustration in traumatic brain injury

Overview of attention for article published in Diagnostic and Prognostic Research, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 126)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
31 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does poor methodological quality of prediction modeling studies translate to poor model performance? An illustration in traumatic brain injury
Published in
Diagnostic and Prognostic Research, May 2022
DOI 10.1186/s41512-022-00122-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Isabel R. A. Retel Helmrich, Ana Mikolić, David M. Kent, Hester F. Lingsma, Laure Wynants, Ewout W. Steyerberg, David van Klaveren

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 40%
Other 2 20%
Professor 1 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 10%
Social Sciences 1 10%
Engineering 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,910,023
of 25,551,063 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostic and Prognostic Research
#20
of 126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,694
of 446,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostic and Prognostic Research
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,551,063 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 126 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.