↓ Skip to main content

“Many roads lead to Rome and the Artificial Intelligence only shows me one road”: an interview study on physician attitudes regarding the implementation of computerised clinical decision support…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
27 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
“Many roads lead to Rome and the Artificial Intelligence only shows me one road”: an interview study on physician attitudes regarding the implementation of computerised clinical decision support systems
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, May 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12910-022-00787-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daan Van Cauwenberge, Wim Van Biesen, Johan Decruyenaere, Tamara Leune, Sigrid Sterckx

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 8%
Other 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Unspecified 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 31 61%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Unspecified 2 4%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 34 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2022.
All research outputs
#3,096,899
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#322
of 1,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,342
of 446,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#5
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.