↓ Skip to main content

Histological findings of corneal tissue after failed phototherapeutic keratectomy in macular corneal dystrophy – a case report

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ophthalmology, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Histological findings of corneal tissue after failed phototherapeutic keratectomy in macular corneal dystrophy – a case report
Published in
BMC Ophthalmology, May 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12886-022-02400-3
Authors

Caroline Julia Gassel, Jens Martin Rohrbach, Daniel Röck, Karl Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt, Tobias Röck

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2022.
All research outputs
#16,954,207
of 21,753,060 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ophthalmology
#994
of 2,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,104
of 340,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ophthalmology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,753,060 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,158 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them