↓ Skip to main content

Undesirable effect of cosmetic lip augmentation with autologous fat tissue

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Undesirable effect of cosmetic lip augmentation with autologous fat tissue
Published in
BMC Research Notes, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-6-79
Pubmed ID
Authors

Estela Kaminagakura, Jucely Aparecida Rosa, Yasmin Rodarte Carvalho, Janete Dias Almeida

Abstract

Facial cosmetic procedures are commonplace nowadays, especially techniques that aim to increase lip volume. Full lips provide a youthful, healthy, feminine and sensual appearance. There are many techniques and materials used to recover the loss of contour that occurs with age.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 2 15%
Student > Master 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 3 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 54%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Unknown 5 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2013.
All research outputs
#13,870,670
of 21,344,814 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#2,041
of 4,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,480
of 170,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,344,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,124 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them