You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Macrophages in inflammatory multiple sclerosis lesions have an intermediate activation status
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Neuroinflammation, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1742-2094-10-35 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daphne YS Vogel, Elly JF Vereyken, Judith E Glim, Priscilla DAM Heijnen, Martina Moeton, Paul van der Valk, Sandra Amor, Charlotte E Teunissen, Jack van Horssen, Christine D Dijkstra |
| Abstract |
Macrophages play a dual role in multiple sclerosis (MS) pathology. They can exert neuroprotective and growth promoting effects but also contribute to tissue damage by production of inflammatory mediators. The effector function of macrophages is determined by the way they are activated. Stimulation of monocyte-derived macrophages in vitro with interferon-γ and lipopolysaccharide results in classically activated (CA/M1) macrophages, and activation with interleukin 4 induces alternatively activated (AA/M2) macrophages. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 473 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Hungary | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 458 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 101 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 77 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 69 | 15% |
| Researcher | 58 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 5% |
| Other | 58 | 12% |
| Unknown | 86 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 108 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 83 | 18% |
| Neuroscience | 57 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 43 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 34 | 7% |
| Other | 39 | 8% |
| Unknown | 109 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,829,767
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#215
of 2,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,453
of 195,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#3
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.