↓ Skip to main content

Guidelines on "Standards of management of idiopathic scoliosis with corrective braces in everyday clinics and in clinical research": SOSORT Consensus 2008

Overview of attention for article published in Scoliosis, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Guidelines on "Standards of management of idiopathic scoliosis with corrective braces in everyday clinics and in clinical research": SOSORT Consensus 2008
Published in
Scoliosis, January 2009
DOI 10.1186/1748-7161-4-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefano Negrini, Theodoros B Grivas, Tomasz Kotwicki, Manuel Rigo, Fabio Zaina

Abstract

Reported failure rates,(defined based on percentage of cases progressing to surgery) of corrective bracing for idiopathic scoliosis are highly variable. This may be due to the quality of the brace itself, but also of the patient care during treatment. The latter is sometimes neglected, even though it is considered a main determinant of good results among conservative experts of SOSORT. The aim of this paper was to develop and verify the Consensus on management of scoliosis patients treated with braces

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 96 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 14%
Student > Master 13 13%
Other 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Other 27 27%
Unknown 12 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 15%
Engineering 8 8%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 14 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2013.
All research outputs
#6,645,260
of 11,871,144 outputs
Outputs from Scoliosis
#79
of 190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,828
of 132,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scoliosis
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,871,144 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 190 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.