↓ Skip to main content

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adult patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective large cohort multicenter study in Japan

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
39 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adult patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective large cohort multicenter study in Japan
Published in
Critical Care, May 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13054-022-03998-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Akihiko Inoue, Toru Hifumi, Tetsuya Sakamoto, Hiroshi Okamoto, Jun Kunikata, Hideto Yokoi, Hirotaka Sawano, Yuko Egawa, Shunichi Kato, Kazuhiro Sugiyama, Naofumi Bunya, Takehiko Kasai, Shinichi Ijuin, Shinichi Nakayama, Jun Kanda, Seiya Kanou, Toru Takiguchi, Shoji Yokobori, Hiroaki Takada, Kazushige Inoue, Ichiro Takeuchi, Hiroshi Honzawa, Makoto Kobayashi, Tomohiro Hamagami, Wataru Takayama, Yasuhiro Otomo, Kunihiko Maekawa, Takafumi Shimizu, Satoshi Nara, Michitaka Nasu, Kuniko Takahashi, Yoshihiro Hagiwara, Shigeki Kushimoto, Reo Fukuda, Takayuki Ogura, Shin-ichiro Shiraishi, Ryosuke Zushi, Norio Otani, Migaku Kikuchi, Kazuhiro Watanabe, Takuo Nakagami, Tomohisa Shoko, Nobuya Kitamura, Takayuki Otani, Yoshinori Matsuoka, Makoto Aoki, Masaaki Sakuraya, Hideki Arimoto, Koichiro Homma, Hiromichi Naito, Shunichiro Nakao, Tomoya Okazaki, Yoshio Tahara, Yasuhiro Kuroda

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 24 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 25 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,655,257
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,458
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,289
of 445,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#38
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.