You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Impact of pharmacist services on economic, clinical, and humanistic outcome (ECHO) of South Asian patients: a systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice, May 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40545-022-00431-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sunil Shrestha, Rajeev Shrestha, Ali Ahmed, Binaya Sapkota, Asmita Priyadarshini Khatiwada, Christina Malini Christopher, Parbati Thapa, Bhuvan Kc, Ali Qais Blebil, Saval Khanal, Vibhu Paudyal |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 2 | 50% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 4% |
Researcher | 3 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 10% |
Unknown | 41 | 60% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 18% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 7% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Unknown | 42 | 62% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2022.
All research outputs
#6,554,364
of 23,221,875 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
#155
of 419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,467
of 441,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,221,875 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 419 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.