You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Challenges and lessons learned during the planning and early implementation of the RTS,S/AS01E malaria vaccine in three regions of Ghana: a qualitative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12936-022-04168-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jane Grant, Thomas Gyan, Francis Agbokey, Jayne Webster, Brian Greenwood, Kwaku Poku Asante |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Peru | 1 | 17% |
| Japan | 1 | 17% |
| Turkey | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 107 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 57 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 61 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2022.
All research outputs
#13,227,671
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#3,222
of 5,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,577
of 442,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#55
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,655 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.