You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ground truth labels challenge the validity of sepsis consensus definitions in critical illness
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12967-022-03228-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Holger A. Lindner, Shigehiko Schamoni, Thomas Kirschning, Corinna Worm, Bianka Hahn, Franz-Simon Centner, Jochen J. Schoettler, Michael Hagmann, Jörg Krebs, Dennis Mangold, Stephanie Nitsch, Stefan Riezler, Manfred Thiel, Verena Schneider-Lindner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 7 | 30% |
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 7 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,862,722
of 24,884,310 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#328
of 4,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,779
of 548,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#10
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,884,310 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,503 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 548,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.