↓ Skip to main content

Experience and challenges from clinical trials with malaria vaccines in Africa

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Experience and challenges from clinical trials with malaria vaccines in Africa
Published in
Malaria Journal, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-12-86
Pubmed ID
Authors

Grace Mwangoka, Bernhards Ogutu, Beverly Msambichaka, Tutu Mzee, Nahya Salim, Shubis Kafuruki, Maxmillian Mpina, Seif Shekalaghe, Marcel Tanner, Salim Abdulla

Abstract

Malaria vaccines are considered amongst the most important modalities for potential elimination of malaria disease and transmission. Research and development in this field has been an area of intense effort by many groups over the last few decades. Despite this, there is currently no licensed malaria vaccine. Researchers, clinical trialists and vaccine developers have been working on many approached to make malaria vaccine available.African research institutions have developed and demonstrated a great capacity to undertake clinical trials in accordance to the International Conference on Harmonization-Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP) standards in the last decade; particularly in the field of malaria vaccines and anti-malarial drugs. This capacity is a result of networking among African scientists in collaboration with other partners; this has traversed both clinical trials and malaria control programmes as part of the Global Malaria Action Plan (GMAP). GMAP outlined and support global strategies toward the elimination and eradication of malaria in many areas, translating in reduction in public health burden, especially for African children. In the sub-Saharan region the capacity to undertake more clinical trials remains small in comparison to the actual need.However, sustainability of the already developed capacity is essential and crucial for the evaluation of different interventions and diagnostic tools/strategies for other diseases like TB, HIV, neglected tropical diseases and non-communicable diseases. There is urgent need for innovative mechanisms for the sustainability and expansion of the capacity in clinical trials in sub-Saharan Africa as the catalyst for health improvement and maintained.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 203 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 22%
Researcher 34 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Other 15 7%
Other 36 17%
Unknown 32 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 18%
Social Sciences 19 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Other 38 18%
Unknown 39 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2013.
All research outputs
#14,292,849
of 24,030,717 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#3,666
of 5,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,622
of 197,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#49
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,030,717 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,770 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.