You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical and biochemical endpoints and predictors of response to plasma exchange in septic shock: results from a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-022-04003-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Klaus Stahl, Philipp Wand, Benjamin Seeliger, Pedro David Wendel-Garcia, Julius J. Schmidt, Bernhard M. W. Schmidt, Andrea Sauer, Felix Lehmann, Ulrich Budde, Markus Busch, Olaf Wiesner, Tobias Welte, Hermann Haller, Heiner Wedemeyer, Christian Putensen, Marius M. Hoeper, Christian Bode, Sascha David |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 20% |
| Unknown | 13 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 13 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,218,149
of 25,571,620 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,948
of 6,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,974
of 446,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#52
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,571,620 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,588 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.