You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Best–worst scaling methodology to evaluate constructs of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: application to the implementation of pharmacogenetic testing for antidepressant therapy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science Communications, May 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s43058-022-00300-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ramzi G. Salloum, Jeffrey R. Bishop, Amanda L. Elchynski, D. Max Smith, Elizabeth Rowe, Kathryn V. Blake, Nita A. Limdi, Christina L. Aquilante, Jill Bates, Amber L. Beitelshees, Amber Cipriani, Benjamin Q. Duong, Philip E. Empey, Christine M. Formea, J. Kevin Hicks, Pawel Mroz, David Oslin, Amy L. Pasternak, Natasha Petry, Laura B. Ramsey, Allyson Schlichte, Sandra M. Swain, Kristen M. Ward, Kristin Wiisanen, Todd C. Skaar, Sara L. Van Driest, Larisa H. Cavallari, Sony Tuteja |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 30% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
Colombia | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 11 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 50% |
Scientists | 8 | 40% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 25% |
Student > Master | 2 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
Psychology | 1 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 8% |
Other | 2 | 17% |
Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,570,284
of 24,410,160 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science Communications
#87
of 479 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,736
of 431,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science Communications
#8
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,410,160 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 479 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.