↓ Skip to main content

The CARDIA-trial protocol: a multinational, prospective, randomized, clinical trial comparing transthoracic esophagectomy with transhiatal extended gastrectomy in adenocarcinoma of the…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The CARDIA-trial protocol: a multinational, prospective, randomized, clinical trial comparing transthoracic esophagectomy with transhiatal extended gastrectomy in adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) type II
Published in
BMC Cancer, August 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12885-020-07152-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica M. Leers, Laura Knepper, Arjen van der Veen, Wolfgang Schröder, Hans Fuchs, Petra Schiller, Martin Hellmich, Ulrike Zettelmeyer, Lodewijk A. A. Brosens, Alexander Quaas, Jelle P. Ruurda, Richard van Hillegersberg, Christiane J. Bruns

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 18 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 44%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 18 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2022.
All research outputs
#15,026,718
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#3,712
of 8,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,867
of 400,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#54
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,441 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.