You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The CARDIA-trial protocol: a multinational, prospective, randomized, clinical trial comparing transthoracic esophagectomy with transhiatal extended gastrectomy in adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) type II
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Cancer, August 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12885-020-07152-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jessica M. Leers, Laura Knepper, Arjen van der Veen, Wolfgang Schröder, Hans Fuchs, Petra Schiller, Martin Hellmich, Ulrike Zettelmeyer, Lodewijk A. A. Brosens, Alexander Quaas, Jelle P. Ruurda, Richard van Hillegersberg, Christiane J. Bruns |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 50% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
Other | 8 | 19% |
Unknown | 18 | 42% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 44% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 18 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2022.
All research outputs
#15,026,718
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#3,712
of 8,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,867
of 400,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#54
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,441 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.