↓ Skip to main content

Identification and validation of an eight-lncRNA signature that predicts prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification and validation of an eight-lncRNA signature that predicts prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Published in
Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters, May 2022
DOI 10.1186/s11658-022-00331-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jinfeng Zhang, Xiaodong Ling, Chengyuan Fang, Jianqun Ma

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2022.
All research outputs
#18,810,584
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters
#252
of 496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#316,123
of 443,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters
#16
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 496 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.