↓ Skip to main content

Microbial phylogenetic profiling with the Pacific Biosciences sequencing platform

Overview of attention for article published in Microbiome, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
342 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Microbial phylogenetic profiling with the Pacific Biosciences sequencing platform
Published in
Microbiome, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/2049-2618-1-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erin B Fichot, R Sean Norman

Abstract

High-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons has revolutionized the capacity and depth of microbial community profiling. Several sequencing platforms are available, but most phylogenetic studies are performed on the 454-pyrosequencing platform because its longer reads can give finer phylogenetic resolution. The Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) sequencing platform is significantly less expensive per run, does not rely on amplification for library generation, and generates reads that are, on average, four times longer than those from 454 (C2 chemistry), but the resulting high error rates appear to preclude its use in phylogenetic profiling. Recently, however, the PacBio platform was used to characterize four electrosynthetic microbiomes to the genus-level for less than USD 1,000 through the use of PacBio's circular consensus sequence technology. Here, we describe in greater detail: 1) the output from successful 16S rRNA gene amplicon profiling with PacBio, 2) how the analysis was contingent upon several alterations to standard bioinformatic quality control workflows, and 3) the advantages and disadvantages of using the PacBio platform for community profiling.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 342 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 3%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Other 8 2%
Unknown 309 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 89 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 78 23%
Student > Master 40 12%
Student > Bachelor 25 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 6%
Other 59 17%
Unknown 30 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 182 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 57 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 5%
Computer Science 12 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 3%
Other 27 8%
Unknown 37 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2014.
All research outputs
#2,638,950
of 24,953,268 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#1,036
of 1,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,936
of 199,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,953,268 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,711 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.5. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.