You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Correction: Clinical outcome measures in dementia with Lewy bodies trials: critique and recommendations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Translational Neurodegeneration, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40035-022-00306-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Federico Rodriguez-Porcel, Kathryn A. Wyman-Chick, Carla Abdelnour Ruiz, Jon B. Toledo, Daniel Ferreira, Prabitha Urwyler, Rimona S. Weil, Joseph Kane, Andrea Pilotto, Arvid Rongve, Bradley Boeve, John-Paul Taylor, Ian McKeith, Dag Aarsland, Simon J. G. Lewis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2022.
All research outputs
#3,625,468
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Translational Neurodegeneration
#191
of 385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,980
of 444,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Translational Neurodegeneration
#11
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 385 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.