↓ Skip to main content

Repeatability and variation of region-of-interest methods using quantitative diffusion tensor MR imaging of the brain

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Imaging, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Repeatability and variation of region-of-interest methods using quantitative diffusion tensor MR imaging of the brain
Published in
BMC Medical Imaging, October 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2342-12-30
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ullamari Hakulinen, Antti Brander, Pertti Ryymin, Juha Öhman, Seppo Soimakallio, Mika Helminen, Prasun Dastidar, Hannu Eskola

Abstract

Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is increasingly used in various diseases as a clinical tool for assessing the integrity of the brain's white matter. Reduced fractional anisotropy (FA) and an increased apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) are nonspecific findings in most pathological processes affecting the brain's parenchyma. At present, there is no gold standard for validating diffusion measures, which are dependent on the scanning protocols, methods of the softwares and observers. Therefore, the normal variation and repeatability effects on commonly-derived measures should be carefully examined.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 51 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 22%
Researcher 12 22%
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 33%
Neuroscience 9 17%
Engineering 6 11%
Computer Science 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 14 26%