You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cashew apple juice supplementation enhanced fat utilization during high-intensity exercise in trained and untrained men
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1550-2783-10-13 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Piyapong Prasertsri, Thapanee Roengrit, Yupaporn Kanpetta, Terdthai Tong-un, Supaporn Muchimapura, Jintanaporn Wattanathorn, Naruemon Leelayuwat |
| Abstract |
Exercise training is known to increase fat utilization during exercise. Diets containing antioxidants and branch chain amino acids (BCAAs) are also reported to have potential effects on fat utilization. Cashew apple juice (CAJ) comprises many nutritional components including vitamin C and BCAAs. This study aimed to investigate the effect of CAJ supplementation on substrate utilization during high-intensity exercise in trained and untrained subjects. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 23% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Qatar | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 7 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 19% |
| Scientists | 5 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 83 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 18% |
| Researcher | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 17 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 16 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 25 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2015.
All research outputs
#1,447,949
of 23,662,553 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#330
of 899 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,998
of 444,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#319
of 851 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,662,553 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 899 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 851 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.