You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Early management of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in a hospital with neurosurgical/neuroendovascular facilities: a consensus and clinical recommendations of the Italian Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care (SIAARTI)—part 2
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s44158-022-00049-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Edoardo Picetti, Andrea Barbanera, Claudio Bernucci, Alessandro Bertuccio, Federico Bilotta, Edoardo Pietro Boccardi, Tullio Cafiero, Anselmo Caricato, Carlo Alberto Castioni, Marco Cenzato, Arturo Chieregato, Giuseppe Citerio, Paolo Gritti, Luigi Lanterna, Roberto Menozzi, Marina Munari, Pietro Panni, Sandra Rossi, Nino Stocchetti, Carmelo Sturiale, Tommaso Zoerle, Gianluigi Zona, Frank Rasulo, Chiara Robba |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 10 | 14% |
| Italy | 5 | 7% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 4 | 6% |
| Colombia | 4 | 6% |
| United States | 4 | 6% |
| Chile | 3 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 3% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Peru | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 30 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 56 | 81% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
| Scientists | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 20 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 31% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 18 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2023.
All research outputs
#932,625
of 25,263,619 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care
#7
of 111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,894
of 435,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,263,619 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 111 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.