You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
WS-SNPs&GO: a web server for predicting the deleterious effect of human protein variants using functional annotation
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Genomics, May 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-14-s3-s6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Emidio Capriotti, Remo Calabrese, Piero Fariselli, Pier Luigi Martelli, Russ B Altman, Rita Casadio |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 257 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 3 | 1% |
United States | 2 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 250 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 41 | 16% |
Student > Master | 32 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 11% |
Researcher | 24 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 6% |
Other | 39 | 15% |
Unknown | 78 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 90 | 35% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 16% |
Unspecified | 8 | 3% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 2% |
Computer Science | 5 | 2% |
Other | 23 | 9% |
Unknown | 85 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2022.
All research outputs
#4,369,297
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#1,656
of 11,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,950
of 207,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#36
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.