↓ Skip to main content

A clinical study of the effects of lead poisoning on the intelligence and neurobehavioral abilities of children

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 288)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
321 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A clinical study of the effects of lead poisoning on the intelligence and neurobehavioral abilities of children
Published in
Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1742-4682-10-13
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shuangxing Hou, Lianfang Yuan, Pengpeng Jin, Bojun Ding, Na Qin, Li Li, Xuedong Liu, Zhongliang Wu, Gang Zhao, Yanchun Deng

Abstract

Lead is a heavy metal and important environmental toxicant and nerve poison that can destruction many functions of the nervous system. Lead poisoning is a medical condition caused by increased levels of lead in the body. Lead interferes with a variety of body processes and is toxic to many organs and issues, including the central nervous system. It interferes with the development of the nervous system, and is therefore particularly toxic to children, causing potentially permanent neural and cognitive impairments. In this study, we investigated the relationship between lead poisoning and the intellectual and neurobehavioral capabilities of children.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 321 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 320 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 53 17%
Student > Master 44 14%
Researcher 19 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 5%
Student > Postgraduate 12 4%
Other 45 14%
Unknown 131 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 12%
Environmental Science 24 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 6%
Psychology 18 6%
Chemistry 17 5%
Other 63 20%
Unknown 141 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,280,031
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling
#14
of 288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,207
of 205,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.