You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Chin tuck against resistance exercise with feedback to improve swallowing, eating and drinking in frail older people admitted to hospital with pneumonia: protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, May 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40814-022-01060-w |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David G. Smithard, Ian Swaine, Salma Ayis, Alberto Gambaruto, Aoife Stone-Ghariani, Dharinee Hansjee, Stefan T. Kulnik, Peter Kyberd, Elizabeth Lloyd-Dehler, William Oliff |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 8 | 73% |
Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 7 | 11% |
Researcher | 6 | 9% |
Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 15% |
Unknown | 30 | 46% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 18% |
Unspecified | 7 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 5% |
Psychology | 3 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Unknown | 31 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2022.
All research outputs
#3,254,597
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#208
of 1,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,751
of 437,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#10
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.