↓ Skip to main content

Data quality monitoring and performance metrics of a prospective, population-based observational study of maternal and newborn health in low resource settings

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Health, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Data quality monitoring and performance metrics of a prospective, population-based observational study of maternal and newborn health in low resource settings
Published in
Reproductive Health, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/1742-4755-12-s2-s2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shivaprasad S Goudar, Kristen B Stolka, Marion Koso-Thomas, Narayan V Honnungar, Shivanand C Mastiholi, Umesh Y Ramadurg, Sangappa M Dhaded, Omrana Pasha, Archana Patel, Fabian Esamai, Elwyn Chomba, Ana Garces, Fernando Althabe, Waldemar A Carlo, Robert L Goldenberg, Patricia L Hibberd, Edward A Liechty, Nancy F Krebs, Michael K Hambidge, Janet L Moore, Dennis D Wallace, Richard J Derman, Kodkany S Bhalachandra, Carl L Bose

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sierra Leone 1 <1%
Unknown 106 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 19%
Researcher 19 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 27 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 31%
Social Sciences 13 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 31 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2024.
All research outputs
#8,551,787
of 25,416,581 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#964
of 1,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,663
of 280,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#24
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,416,581 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,573 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.