You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effects of oral iron supplementation on cognition in older children and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-9-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin Falkingham, Asmaa Abdelhamid, Peter Curtis, Susan Fairweather-Tait, Louise Dye, Lee Hooper |
| Abstract |
In observational studies anaemia and iron deficiency are associated with cognitive deficits, suggesting that iron supplementation may improve cognitive function. However, due to the potential for confounding by socio-economic status in observational studies, this needs to be verified in data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 40% |
| Turkey | 1 | 20% |
| Russia | 1 | 20% |
| Canada | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 374 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 365 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 59 | 16% |
| Researcher | 51 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 45 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 25 | 7% |
| Other | 67 | 18% |
| Unknown | 99 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 98 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 41 | 11% |
| Psychology | 23 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 59 | 16% |
| Unknown | 118 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2020.
All research outputs
#3,040,813
of 25,196,456 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#637
of 1,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,651
of 175,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,196,456 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,504 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.