You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Engaging people with lived experience on advisory councils of a national not-for-profit: an integrated knowledge translation case study of Heart & Stroke Mission Critical Area Councils
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12961-022-00863-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Krystina B. Lewis, Nedra Peter, Ian D. Graham, Anita Kothari |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| Australia | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Librarian | 2 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 20 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 22 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2023.
All research outputs
#7,262,538
of 25,169,746 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#863
of 1,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,611
of 434,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#21
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,169,746 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.