You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The impact of small-group virtual patient simulator training on perceptions of individual learning process and curricular integration: a multicentre cohort study of nursing and medical students
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Education, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12909-022-03426-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
André Mestre, Marek Muster, Ahmed Rhassane El Adib, Hugrun Ösp Egilsdottir, Kirsten Røland Byermoen, Miguel Padilha, Thania Aguilar, Nino Tabagari, Lorraine Betts, Leila Sales, Pedro Garcia, Luo Ling, Hugo Café, Alexandra Binnie, Ana Marreiros |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hungary | 1 | 33% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 84 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Librarian | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 45 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 44 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2022.
All research outputs
#13,392,948
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,640
of 3,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,085
of 443,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#75
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,436 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.