You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Accuracy and tolerability of self-sampling of capillary blood for analysis of inflammation and autoantibodies in rheumatoid arthritis patients—results from a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Arthritis Research & Therapy, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13075-022-02809-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Johannes Knitza, Koray Tascilar, Nicolas Vuillerme, Ekaterina Eimer, Paul Matusewicz, Giulia Corte, Louis Schuster, Timothée Aubourg, Gerlinde Bendzuck, Marianne Korinth, Corinna Elling-Audersch, Arnd Kleyer, Sebastian Boeltz, Axel J. Hueber, Gerhard Krönke, Georg Schett, David Simon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 4 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 15% |
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| Lebanon | 1 | 5% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 5% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Turkey | 1 | 5% |
| Nicaragua | 1 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 50% |
| Scientists | 5 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 13% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 15 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 16 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2022.
All research outputs
#3,063,847
of 25,756,531 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#620
of 3,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,714
of 446,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#13
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.