You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Psychometric properties of measures of substance use: a systematic review and meta-analysis of reliability, validity and diagnostic test accuracy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-020-00963-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Glenn-Milo Santos, Steffanie A. Strathdee, Nabila El-Bassel, Poonam Patel, Divya Subramanian, Danielle Horyniak, Ryan R. Cook, Charlotte McCullagh, Phillip Marotta, Foram Choksi, Brian Kang, Isabel Allen, Steven Shoptaw |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 16% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 19 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 12% |
| Psychology | 4 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 18 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2022.
All research outputs
#14,556,454
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,413
of 2,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,094
of 383,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#60
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,057 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.