You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Murradambirra Dhangaang (make food secure): Aboriginal community and stakeholder perspectives on food insecurity in urban and regional Australia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-022-13202-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simone Sherriff, Deanna Kalucy, Allison Tong, Nawazish Naqvi, Janice Nixon, Sandra Eades, Tangerene Ingram, Kym Slater, Michelle Dickson, Amanda Lee, Sumithra Muthayya |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 38% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Researcher | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 5% |
| Librarian | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 38 | 66% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 6 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 38 | 66% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2022.
All research outputs
#6,021,419
of 24,608,500 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,047
of 16,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,916
of 431,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#136
of 460 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,608,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 460 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.