↓ Skip to main content

Anti-TNF therapy for ulcerative colitis in Brazil: a comparative real-world national retrospective multicentric study from the Brazilian study group of IBD (GEDIIB)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Gastroenterology, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anti-TNF therapy for ulcerative colitis in Brazil: a comparative real-world national retrospective multicentric study from the Brazilian study group of IBD (GEDIIB)
Published in
BMC Gastroenterology, May 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12876-022-02341-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ligia Yukie Sassaki, Daniela Oliveira Magro, Rogerio Saad-Hossne, Julio Pinheiro Baima, Cristina Flores, Lucianna Motta Correia, Lívia Medeiros Soares Celani, Maria De Lourdes De Abreu Ferrari, Patricia Zacharias, Marley Ribeiro Feitosa, Carlos Henrique Marques Dos Santos, Manoel Alvaro De Freitas Lins Neto, Abel Botelho Quaresma, Sergio Figueiredo De Lima Junior, Graciana Bandeira Salgado De Vasconcelos, Ornella Sari Cassol, Arlene Dos Santos Pinto, Gustavo Kurachi, Francisco de Assis Goncalves Filho, Rodrigo Galhardi Gasparini, Thaísa Kowalski Furlan, Wilson Roberto Catapani, Cláudio Saddy Rodrigues Coy, Vivian De Souza Menegassi, Marilia Majeski Colombo, Renata de Sá Brito Fróes, Fabio Vieira Teixeira, Antonio Carlos Moraes, Genoile Oliveira Santana, José Miguel Luz Parente, Eduardo Garcia Vilela, Natália Sousa Freitas Queiroz, Paulo Gustavo Kotze

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 11%
Psychology 1 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2022.
All research outputs
#19,294,479
of 23,891,012 outputs
Outputs from BMC Gastroenterology
#1,191
of 1,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#315,856
of 442,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Gastroenterology
#41
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,891,012 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,849 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,998 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.