You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Early-stage cervical cancer diagnosis based on an ultra-sensitive electrochemical DNA nanobiosensor for HPV-18 detection in real samples
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12951-020-0577-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pegah Mahmoodi, Majid Rezayi, Elisa Rasouli, Amir Avan, Mehrdad Gholami, Majid Ghayour Mobarhan, Ehsan Karimi, Yatima Alias |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 99 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 10% |
| Researcher | 8 | 8% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 4 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 18% |
| Unknown | 44 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 14 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 7% |
| Engineering | 7 | 7% |
| Chemical Engineering | 6 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 48 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2022.
All research outputs
#14,526,878
of 25,770,491 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#452
of 2,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,949
of 479,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#13
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,770,491 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,005 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.