You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pathophysiological mechanisms of root resorption after dental trauma: a systematic scoping review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Oral Health, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12903-021-01510-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kerstin M. Galler, Eva-Maria Grätz, Matthias Widbiller, Wolfgang Buchalla, Helge Knüttel |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 86 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 44 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 40% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 45 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,657,585
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from BMC Oral Health
#438
of 1,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,300
of 430,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Oral Health
#20
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,528 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.