You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Application of mobile-technology for disease and treatment monitoring of malaria in the "Better Border Healthcare Programme"
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-9-237 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pongthep Meankaew, Jaranit Kaewkungwal, Amnat Khamsiriwatchara, Podjadeach Khunthong, Pratap Singhasivanon, Wichai Satimai |
| Abstract |
The main objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of integrating the use of cell-phones into a routine malaria prevention and control programme, to improve the management of malaria cases among an under-served population in a border area. The module for disease and treatment monitoring of malaria (DTMM) consisted of case investigation and case follow-up for treatment compliance and patients' symptoms. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 308 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 295 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 65 | 21% |
| Researcher | 58 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 71 | 23% |
| Unknown | 43 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 73 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 39 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 61 | 20% |
| Unknown | 61 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,989,519
of 24,601,689 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#634
of 5,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,344
of 98,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#6
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,601,689 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,762 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.