↓ Skip to main content

The development and evaluation of the Australian child and adolescent recommended food score: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The development and evaluation of the Australian child and adolescent recommended food score: a cross-sectional study
Published in
Nutrition Journal, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-11-96
Pubmed ID
Authors

Skye Marshall, Jane Watson, Tracy Burrows, Maya Guest, Clare E Collins

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 105 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 24%
Student > Master 13 12%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Postgraduate 10 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 27 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 31 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 8%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 33 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2017.
All research outputs
#3,802,505
of 22,896,955 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#678
of 1,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,483
of 276,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#19
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,896,955 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,433 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.