You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
TIDieR-telehealth: precision in reporting of telehealth interventions used in clinical trials - unique considerations for the Template for the Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-022-01640-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel I. Rhon, Julie M. Fritz, Robert D. Kerns, Donald D. McGeary, Brian C. Coleman, Shawn Farrokhi, Diana J. Burgess, Christine M. Goertz, Stephanie L. Taylor, Tammy Hoffmann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 5 | 14% |
| United States | 5 | 14% |
| Canada | 3 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 6% |
| Brazil | 2 | 6% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 18 | 51% |
| Members of the public | 14 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 17% |
| Unknown | 19 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 22 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,739,070
of 25,537,395 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#215
of 2,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,280
of 447,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#4
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,537,395 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,294 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,495 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.