↓ Skip to main content

Personality traits in chronic daily headache patients with and without psychiatric comorbidity: an observational study in a tertiary care headache center

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Headache and Pain, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Personality traits in chronic daily headache patients with and without psychiatric comorbidity: an observational study in a tertiary care headache center
Published in
The Journal of Headache and Pain, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1129-2377-14-22
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marialuisa Rausa, Sabina Cevoli, Elisa Sancisi, Daniela Grimaldi, Gabriella Pollutri, Michela Casoria, Daniela Grieco, Alberto Bisi, Pietro Cortelli, Euro Pozzi, Giulia Pierangeli

Abstract

Previous studies suggest that patients with Chronic Daily Headache (CDH) have higher levels of anxiety and depressive disorders than patients with episodic migraine or tension-type headache. However, no study has considered the presence of psychiatric comorbidity in the analysis of personality traits. The aim of this study is to investigate the prevalence of psychiatric comorbidity and specific personality traits in CDH patients, exploring if specific personality traits are associated to headache itself or to the psychiatric comorbidity associated with headache.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 2%
Norway 1 2%
Unknown 55 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Student > Master 6 11%
Researcher 5 9%
Other 5 9%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 25%
Psychology 13 23%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 15 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2013.
All research outputs
#7,754,664
of 25,375,376 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Headache and Pain
#739
of 1,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,290
of 201,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Headache and Pain
#13
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,375,376 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,526 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.