↓ Skip to main content

Politics and its intersection with coverage with evidence development: a qualitative analysis from expert interviews

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Politics and its intersection with coverage with evidence development: a qualitative analysis from expert interviews
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-88
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danielle Bishop, Joel Lexchin

Abstract

Pressures on health care budgets have led policy makers to discuss how to balance the provision of costly technologies to populations in need and making coverage decisions under uncertainty. Coverage with evidence development (CED) is being employed to meet these challenges.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 70 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 19%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 15 21%
Unknown 13 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 21%
Social Sciences 15 21%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 13 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2013.
All research outputs
#1,450,159
of 11,344,026 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#566
of 3,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,255
of 128,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#18
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,344,026 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,598 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.