@OldManStompyCC @xeltweet That specific paper is about rodents, and scientists have criticized it for being very limited in scope - as it's a meta-analysis of other studies, they make some assumptions about the causes of tumors. See this response: https://
@RagingLazerbull @CryptoLULW @scrypto_ Nice and we should also expose all angles: https://t.co/hc3676nshp
@MindMusclePro What is good about following studies is you get to see multiple positions. The evidence / study i posted looks sound? However you then need to see if it has been peer reviewed. This then follows https://t.co/SlyySeA4Wa