You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Intermittent fasting two days versus one day per week, matched for total energy intake and expenditure, increases weight loss in overweight/obese men and women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12937-022-00790-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul J. Arciero, Karen M. Arciero, Michelle Poe, Alex E. Mohr, Stephen J. Ives, Autumn Arciero, Molly Boyce, Jin Zhang, Melissa Haas, Emma Valdez, Delaney Corbet, Kaitlyn Judd, Annika Smith, Olivia Furlong, Marley Wahler, Eric Gumpricht |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 16% |
| India | 4 | 8% |
| Spain | 4 | 8% |
| Argentina | 2 | 4% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 23 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 20% |
| Scientists | 4 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 115 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 6% |
| Researcher | 5 | 4% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 68 | 59% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 69 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,521,145
of 25,211,948 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#401
of 1,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,141
of 438,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,211,948 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,504 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.