You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluation of an intelligent artificial climate chamber for high-throughput crop phenotyping in wheat
|
---|---|
Published in |
Plant Methods, June 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13007-022-00916-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anhua Ren, Dong Jiang, Min Kang, Jie Wu, Fangcheng Xiao, Pei Hou, Xiuqing Fu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 9% |
Sudan | 1 | 9% |
Taiwan | 1 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 7 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 27% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 9% |
Student > Master | 1 | 9% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 27% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 18% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 9% |
Engineering | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2022.
All research outputs
#6,218,635
of 24,350,163 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#360
of 1,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,194
of 434,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#14
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,350,163 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.