You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
ACCORD guideline for reporting consensus-based methods in biomedical research and clinical practice: a study protocol
|
---|---|
Published in |
Research Integrity and Peer Review, June 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s41073-022-00122-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
William T. Gattrell, Amrit Pali Hungin, Amy Price, Christopher C. Winchester, David Tovey, Ellen L. Hughes, Esther J. van Zuuren, Keith Goldman, Patricia Logullo, Robert Matheis, Niall Harrison |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 10 | 30% |
Canada | 2 | 6% |
Australia | 2 | 6% |
Brazil | 1 | 3% |
Peru | 1 | 3% |
Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 16 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 17 | 52% |
Scientists | 8 | 24% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 15% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 21% |
Other | 7 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 12% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
Other | 7 | 13% |
Unknown | 15 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 33% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 12% |
Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 13% |
Unknown | 17 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,694,232
of 23,878,777 outputs
Outputs from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#71
of 121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,426
of 432,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,878,777 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 121 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 69.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.