You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Early versus delayed enteral nutrition in mechanically ventilated patients with circulatory shock: a nested cohort analysis of an international multicenter, pragmatic clinical trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-022-04047-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luis Ortiz-Reyes, Jayshil J. Patel, Xuran Jiang, Angel Coz Yataco, Andrew G. Day, Faraaz Shah, James Zelten, Maximiliano Tamae-Kakazu, Todd Rice, Daren K. Heyland |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 83 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 10% |
| Japan | 4 | 5% |
| Mexico | 3 | 4% |
| Spain | 3 | 4% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Singapore | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 39 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 52 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 24 | 29% |
| Scientists | 6 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 34 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 35 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2024.
All research outputs
#703,918
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#479
of 6,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,478
of 450,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#11
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,614 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.