You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Misleading measures in Vitamin D analysis: A novel LC-MS/MS assay to account for epimers and isobars
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-10-46 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Iltaf Shah, Ricky James, James Barker, Andrea Petroczi, Declan P Naughton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 165 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 21% |
| Researcher | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 11% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 29 | 17% |
| Unknown | 35 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 46 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Unknown | 40 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,656,468
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#434
of 1,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,293
of 110,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#9
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.