You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Peritoneal tuberculosis mimicking advanced ovarian carcinoma: an important differential diagnosis to consider
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Research Notes, March 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1756-0500-6-88 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maria A Gosein, Dylan Narinesingh, Gordon V Narayansingh, Nazreen A Bhim, Pearse A Sylvester |
Abstract |
Female patients who present with ascites, adnexal masses and elevated CA125 levels are typically presumed to have advanced ovarian carcinoma. This can lead to radical surgery with its associated morbidity. An important differential diagnosis to consider is tuberculous peritonitis which can present in a similar manner and responds well to medical treatment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Tunisia | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 34 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 14% |
Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
Researcher | 3 | 9% |
Other | 8 | 23% |
Unknown | 8 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 60% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Philosophy | 1 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 10 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2019.
All research outputs
#6,256,344
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#953
of 4,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,514
of 195,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#13
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,255 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.