↓ Skip to main content

Multi-dimensional vulnerability analysis on catastrophic health expenditure among middle-aged and older adults with chronic diseases in China

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multi-dimensional vulnerability analysis on catastrophic health expenditure among middle-aged and older adults with chronic diseases in China
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, May 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12874-022-01630-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wenqing Miao, Xiyu Zhang, Baoguo Shi, Wanxin Tian, Bing Wu, Yongqiang Lai, Yuze Li, Zhipeng Huang, Qi Xia, Huiqi Yang, Fan Ding, Linghan Shan, Ling Xin, Jingying Miao, Chenxi Zhang, Ye Li, Xiaodong Li, Qunhong Wu

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 5%
Student > Postgraduate 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 65%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Sports and Recreations 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 13 65%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2022.
All research outputs
#5,728,053
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#812
of 2,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,272
of 437,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#15
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.