You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Isolation and full-genome sequencing of Seneca Valley virus in piglets from China, 2016
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Virology Journal, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12985-016-0631-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Suhong Qian, Wenchun Fan, Ping Qian, Huanchun Chen, Xiangmin Li |
| Abstract |
Seneca valley virus (SVV), a member of the Picornaviridae family, is a small non-enveloped RNA virus, that is linked to porcine idiopathic vesicular disease (PIVD). SVV infection in swine results in vesicular disease and epidemic transient neonatal losses (ETNL). The first case of SVV infection was reported in Guangdong, South China in 2015. We isolated and characterized an SVV HB-CH-2016 strain from vesicular lesion tissue specimens from piglets with PIVD in Hubei, Central China. The complete genome sequence of SVV HB-CH-2016 strain shares high nucleotide identities (94 to 99 %) with all previously reported SVV genomes, moreover, the polyprotein accounts for 98-99 % of amino acid sequence identity. Therefore, the SVV HB-CH-2016 strain is closely related to the SVV CH-01-2015 strain. The case reported in this paper is the second SVV infection case in China. Our findings demonstrate that sporadic SVV infection has occurred in Central China, and therefore, active surveillance on the swine population is important. Moreover, veterinarians must pay attention to this vesicular disease and reinforce biosecurity measures and prevent SVV spread. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 16% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 6 | 32% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2016.
All research outputs
#20,349,664
of 22,896,955 outputs
Outputs from Virology Journal
#2,886
of 3,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#273,131
of 315,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology Journal
#35
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,896,955 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.