You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Improved wood species identification based on multi-view imagery of the three anatomical planes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-022-00910-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Núbia Rosa da Silva, Victor Deklerck, Jan M. Baetens, Jan Van den Bulcke, Maaike De Ridder, Mélissa Rousseau, Odemir Martinez Bruno, Hans Beeckman, Joris Van Acker, Bernard De Baets, Jan Verwaeren |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 1 | 10% |
| Germany | 1 | 10% |
| Brazil | 1 | 10% |
| Fiji | 1 | 10% |
| Mexico | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 23% |
| Researcher | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 15% |
| Professor | 1 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 8% |
| Engineering | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2023.
All research outputs
#6,248,990
of 25,163,238 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#350
of 1,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,038
of 437,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#12
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,163,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,237 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.