You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Incremental cost and cost-effectiveness of the addition of indoor residual spraying with pirimiphos-methyl in sub-Saharan Africa versus standard malaria control: results of data collection and analysis in the Next Generation Indoor Residual Sprays (NgenIRS) project, an economic-evaluation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12936-022-04160-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joshua Yukich, Peder Digre, Sara Scates, Luc Boydens, Emmanuel Obi, Nicky Moran, Allison Belemvire, Mariandrea Chamorro, Benjamin Johns, Keziah L. Malm, Lena Kolyada, Ignatius Williams, Samuel Asiedu, Seydou Fomba, Jules Mihigo, Desire Boko, Baltazar Candrinho, Rodaly Muthoni, Jimmy Opigo, Catherine Maiteki-Sebuguzi, Damian Rutazaana, Josephat Shililu, Asaph Muhanguzi, Kassahun Belay, Joel Kisubi, Joselyn Annet Atuhairwe, Presley Musonda, Nduka Iwuchukwu, John Ngosa, Elizabeth Chizema, Reuben Zulu, Emmanuel Kooma, John Miller, Adam Bennett, Kyra Arnett, Kenzie Tynuv, Christelle Gogue, Joseph Wagman, Jason H. Richardson, Laurence Slutsker, Molly Robertson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 11% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
| Uganda | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 18 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 17% |
| Unknown | 19 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2022.
All research outputs
#6,738,654
of 24,205,409 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,838
of 5,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,852
of 432,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#42
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,205,409 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.